The Athlete · Ice Hockey (Women's) · Goaltender

Women's ice hockey goaltenders occupy one of the most physically demanding and biomechanically extreme positions in team sport. In a single 60-minute game, the goaltender may execute 30–40 butterfly drops, each one loading the hip joints near their end-range of internal rotation under forces approaching two times body weight. At the professional level in the PWHL, elite starters post save percentages above .920 and face an average of 27–33 shots per 60 minutes. At the NCAA Division I level, the top performers hold save percentages between .930 and .953. Between those benchmarks and the youth player who just learned the butterfly stance lies a measurable physical, technical, and psychological gap. This article maps that gap by sport and position, and prescribes a development path from youth through pro using the Victevo Method.

§1 — The Athlete, Painted

Physical Archetype

The women's ice hockey goaltender is, on average, taller and heavier than teammates at every level. Physical characteristics data from professional leagues confirm the pattern: PWHL and Swedish Women's Hockey League (SDHL) goaltenders average 171–174 cm and approximately 68–69 kg, with a BMI near 23–23.5 kg/m² — the tallest positional group on the roster (Lahti et al. 2024, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research). Data on elite female players trying out for the 2010 U.S. Women's Hockey team show a group mean of 169.7 cm (SD 6.9) and 70.4 kg (SD 7.1) with 15.8% body fat (Ransdell & Murray 2011, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research). Anthropometric study of an elite Spanish women's squad found goalkeepers had the highest mean height (169.5 cm) and body mass (77.4 kg) compared with forwards, centers, and defenders, with significantly elevated suprailiac and abdominal skinfold distributions (Jiménez-Casquet et al. 2024, Nutrients).

Frame matters to this position. Longer limbs extend reach to post, a taller stance covers more net height when upright, and slightly heavier body mass stabilizes against cross-crease momentum. The position does not select for the lightest athlete — it selects for the most mobile one at a given frame size. Hip external rotation range, groin-to-core force transmission, and lateral ground contact strength are the levers that physical development must address from the earliest stage.

Movement Archetype

The defining biomechanical event of the modern women's goaltender is the butterfly drop-and-recover cycle. When a goaltender drops to the butterfly, the hip joints are forced into high-degree flexion combined with internal rotation and abduction — an extreme combination. Research using motion capture confirms that, on average, goaltenders exceed their active internal rotation range of motion during butterfly technique execution, creating the structural conditions for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) at the anterior hip (Frayne et al. 2015, PubMed PMID 26122387). The NSCA identifies hip flexor, adductor, and rotator muscle groups as the primary muscular load-bearers during this movement, and notes that approximately 75% of a goaltender's game time runs at low intensity, with brief bursts of maximal explosiveness representing the remaining 25% (NSCA Coach, Vol. 9.4).

The lateral push-off from butterfly-closed to post-integration and back is a ballistic hip abduction-to-internal-rotation sequence performed under time pressure, typically with 0.1–0.3 seconds of processing time from shot release to save requirement. Vertical jump heights in elite female players average 50.3 cm (SD 5.7), and standing long jump averages 214.8 cm (SD 10.9), representing the explosive capacity demands the position shares with the broader team (Ransdell & Murray 2011). The goaltender, however, expresses that power exclusively in short-arc, directionally constrained patterns rather than the linear skating acceleration of skaters.

Mental Archetype

The goaltender bears singular cognitive and emotional responsibility within the team structure. No other position requires sustained vigilance across a 60-minute game — remaining alert, tracking puck trajectory, reading opponent tendencies, and resetting emotional state after every goal against. The NSCA literature on goaltenders is explicit: anxiety directly degrades mobility and flexibility by increasing muscular tension, precisely the physical attributes most critical to butterfly execution (NSCA Coach, Vol. 9.4).

Peer-reviewed sport psychology research in ice hockey shows that self-regulated learning abilities — including planning, reflection, and effort — are predictive of both current and future performance in elite-level players, alongside decision-making accuracy (Tétreault, Fortin-Guichard & Grondin 2024, International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology). For the goaltender, this translates to the capacity to pre-read shot patterns from early cues (shooter weight transfer, stick blade angle), regulate arousal between high-intensity shot sequences, and maintain attentional focus during extended low-action periods when net traffic is minimal. An internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Training (I-ACT) trial in hockey explicitly noted that adaptation to the exercises was challenging for goaltenders, underscoring the unique psychological demands of the position (Reinebo et al. 2024, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living).

§2 — The 4 Pillars × 5 Segments × 4 Seasons Grid

Pillar 1: Strength & Power

Segment	Off-Season	Pre-Season	In-Season	Post-Season
Youth (8–12)	2×/wk bodyweight squats, split squats, hip hinge patterning; focus on movement quality	Add resistance bands for hip abduction; continue BW lower-body circuits	1×/wk maintenance; bodyweight hip strengthening only	Active rest; gymnastics or dance for hip mobility
Middle School (13–14)	3×/wk goblet squat, Romanian deadlift, Copenhagen plank; build adductor-to-abductor ratio	Introduce trap-bar deadlift 60–70% 1RM; box step-ups with load	2×/wk full-body lifts; adductor strength maintenance priority	GPP: sled push, kettlebell swings; deload week 1
High School (15–18)	3×/wk, 70–80% 1RM compound lower body; CMJ tested monthly; front squat + hip thrust emphasis	3×/wk, increase to 80–85% 1RM; power cleans or trap-bar jumps introduced	2×/wk in-season; heavy single-leg RDL, isometric hip holds; monitor adductor:abductor ratio	2-wk deload; retest CMJ; address strength asymmetries found in-season
College (D3/D2/D1)	4×/wk periodized block; 80–90% 1RM primary lifts; isometric adductor work via Copenhagen plank	3×/wk taper from 4; plyometric loading; force-plate CMJ baseline established	2×/wk conjugate-style; prioritize hip abductor/adductor parity; single-leg force output tracked	Structural deload 3–4 wks; re-baseline force plate; address asymmetries; GPP base build
Pro / Elite (PWHL)	4×/wk max-strength block; 85–92% 1RM lower body; single-leg force plate monthly; Copenhagen plank 3×/wk	3×/wk taper; loaded butterfly transitions; hip thrust heavy singles; eccentric adductor focus	2×/wk reactive strength; depth drop, broad jump; hip monitoring via HRV + HAGOS questionnaire	3-wk active recovery; structural assessment; deload before returning to max strength block

Pillar 2: Speed & Agility

Segment	Off-Season	Pre-Season	In-Season	Post-Season
Youth (8–12)	On-ice agility ladders and edge drills 2×/wk; off-ice lateral shuffle games	Short-burst reaction drills; coach-called directional change	Mirror drills with shooting; basic crease movement with puck in play	Off-ice tag games; balance board work
Middle School (13–14)	3×/wk on-ice butterfly push-and-recover circuit; lateral explosiveness timed	Reaction time drills with visual cues; short-area quickness; pro-agility test	On-ice post-to-post timed set 2×/wk; agility drill review	Off-ice slide board lateral push; reaction light training
High School (15–18)	On-ice 5-hole closure speed timed; off-ice pro-agility 5-10-5; band-resisted lateral push drills	On-ice timed crease movement; reactive cues from coach or light system	Explosive first-step drills pre-skate 3×/wk; film review of movement patterns	Reactive agility baseline; slide board tempo sessions
College (D3/D2/D1)	Sport-specific reactive agility testing (RAT) baseline; on-ice butterfly plus lateral push circuits	Timed lateral efficiency on ice; integrate video-cued reaction with Fitlight or similar	Position-specific agility 2×/wk; reduce volume but maintain speed exposure	Off-ice reactive agility deload; retest RAT
Pro / Elite (PWHL)	Full reactive agility protocol with pre-planned and unplanned components; 5-10-5 and T-test benchmarked	On-ice goalie-specific timed circuits; integrating opponent scout data into reactive drills	2×/wk reactive agility; maintained crease timing via video review; load managed via HRV	Deload reactive work; reassess lateral push velocity and recovery time metrics

Pillar 3: Endurance & Conditioning

Segment	Off-Season	Pre-Season	In-Season	Post-Season
Youth (8–12)	20–30 min low-intensity aerobic activity 3×/wk (swimming, cycling); emphasize recovery habits	On-ice sustained practice sessions 3–4×/wk; aerobic base via skating	2–3 on-ice practices; light off-ice aerobic work if needed	Active recovery: swimming, light cycling; emphasize sleep and nutrition habits
Middle School (13–14)	3×/wk aerobic base work (3 km runs, cycling, rowing); VO2 awareness introduced	On-ice interval circuits; 30-sec bursts with full recovery; aerobic capacity test	On-ice aerobic maintained via practice schedule; no added off-ice aerobic loading	VO2max baseline test; 3-wk active recovery
High School (15–18)	4×/wk aerobic base; 3–5 km tempo runs; VO2 test by mid-off-season; jump rope circuits	Metabolic conditioning 3×/wk; on-ice repeated sprint protocol; lactate recovery monitoring	Aerobic capacity preserved via practice; HRV monitored; no additional high-intensity aerobic in-season	VO2max retest; 2-wk active recovery; baseline aerobic re-established
College (D3/D2/D1)	4×/wk structured aerobic program; VO2max targeted >50 mL/kg/min; rowing or bike intervals	3×/wk aerobic conditioning with sport-specific intervals; goalie-specific repeated burst simulation	HRV-guided aerobic load; bike or row recovery sessions 1–2×/wk; no max aerobic testing in-season	Aerobic capacity deload 2 wks; retest VO2max; address conditioning gaps from season data
Pro / Elite (PWHL)	5×/wk periodized endurance block; VO2max targeted >52–55 mL/kg/min; altitude or heat-acclimation block if available	4×/wk taper; game-simulation repeated burst protocols; lactate monitoring	2×/wk aerobic maintenance; HRV as primary load-management tool; aerobic base protected through full season	Aerobic deload 3–4 wks; nutritional restoration; VO2max retest for next off-season planning

Pillar 4: Skill & Sport-IQ

Segment	Off-Season	Pre-Season	In-Season	Post-Season
Youth (8–12)	Skating fundamentals: edges, pivots, basic butterfly drop; puck-tracking drills with coach	Introduce post-integration; glove and blocker position drills with shots; angle play basics	Game experience; post-game video once per week with coach; read-aloud film sessions	On-ice skills camp; skating development outside goaltender specialization encouraged
Middle School (13–14)	Breakout reads; cross-ice passing; 5-hole closure from butterfly; video study of one pro goaltender	Zone coverage reads; PP and PK positioning; shot-tracking improvement	Game film review 1×/wk; adjust positioning based on opponent scouting with coach	Skills camp; off-ice sport psychology introduction (goal-setting, process focus)
High School (15–18)	Off-ice sport-specific VR or video IQ training; butterfly recover-and-push pattern repetition; glove and blocker technique refinement	Opponent scouting: shooter tendencies; angle play timed; depth positioning in traffic	Film review 2×/wk; referee cue reading (power play awareness); pre-shot routine built	Goaltending clinic; mental performance workshop; review season data with coach
College (D3/D2/D1)	Video-analysis system access; movement pattern audit; position coaching 3–4×/wk; advance cue training	Structured opponent-specific video prep; crease communication drills; hybrid puck-handling under pressure	Advanced film study; reactive cue training (Fitlight); position-specific 8-Core skill composite testing	Comprehensive season debrief; identify top 2 skill gaps; design off-season skill plan
Pro / Elite (PWHL)	Full position coaching 5×/wk; advanced video analysis; off-ice cognitive training (reaction time, dual-task); equipment optimization	Opponent-specific video packages; zone-read drills; hybrid puck-handling under traffic; communication systems with defense	Film review daily; 8-Core sport-skill composite quarterly update; manage cognitive load via structured routines	Full season film audit; 8-Core skill composite re-baseline; identify tactical gaps for next cycle

§3 — Position-Specific Numbers (3 Tiers)

The Victevo 8-Core Testing suite is the canonical reference. Positional benchmarks from PWHL and NCAA D1 data appear as comparative reference columns. Where direct published data for women's goaltenders are unavailable at a specific test, the cell is labeled as an Victevo editorial target derived from the nearest available source.

Metric	Average NCAA D1	Top 10% NCAA D1	Pro Baseline (PWHL)
Sprint — 30-meter (sec)	4.93 (Victevo editorial target — derived from Ransdell & Murray 2011 U.S. national team sample)	4.64	4.50 (Victevo editorial target — derived from SDHL/PWHL physical profiles)
CMJ — Countermovement Jump (cm)	37–42	46–50	50–55 (Victevo editorial target — derived from Ransdell & Murray 2011: elite women 50.3 cm mean)
Force Plate — Reactive Strength Index	1.20–1.40 (Victevo editorial target — derived from elite female normative data)	1.50–1.65	1.65–1.80 (Victevo editorial target)
Reactive Agility — RAT or 5-10-5 (sec)	5.10–5.30 (Victevo editorial target — derived from ice hockey agility norms)	4.90–5.05	4.70–4.90 (Victevo editorial target)
Grip / Iso Strength — Hip Adductor Squeeze (N)	330–380 (Victevo editorial target — derived from Secomb et al. 2023, JSCR)	400–440	450–490 (target add:abd ratio ≥1.25)
Aerobic Capacity — VO2max (mL/kg/min)	48–52 (Victevo editorial target — derived from NSCA Coach 9.4 noting goaltenders require excellent aerobic capacity)	52–56	54–58
Sport-Skill Composite — Save % (Victevo 8-Core anchor)	.910–.922 (derived from NCAA.com D1 2024–25 leaderboards: rank 20–50 range)	.930–.945 (top 10–20 NCAA starters)	.920–.949 (PWHL 2024–25: Desbiens .932, Frankel .921, Schroeder .919)
Recovery / HRV (ms rMSSD)	58–72 (Victevo editorial target — derived from female athlete normative HRV literature)	72–85	78–92 (Victevo editorial target)
GAA — Goals-Against Average	2.40–3.00 (NCAA D1 middle tier)	1.25–1.80 (top NCAA starters: McNaughton 1.25, Doyle 1.29 in 2024–25)	1.86–2.28 (PWHL 2024–25 starters: Desbiens 1.86–Schroeder 2.43 range; QuantHockey)
Hip IR ROM (°) — Pre-Practice Bilateral Mean	28–34	32–38	30–36 (maintaining symmetry; note elite players may show bilateral reduction from cam morphology)

§4 — Medical & Scientific Anchors

Hip and Groin Overuse: The Goaltender's Primary Burden

The single most significant medical finding for women's ice hockey goaltenders is the extreme prevalence of hip and groin problems — and that the majority of these are overuse injuries that do not cause time loss but do reduce self-reported sporting function. In a prospective single-season cohort of 101 elite Swedish ice hockey goalkeepers (17% female), cumulative incidence of all hip and groin problems reached 69% (95% CI, 59–79%), with 36% of goalkeepers experiencing substantial problems (Wörner, Clarsen, Thorborg & Eek 2019, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine). More than 80% of all reported problems were due to overuse, not acute trauma. Goalkeepers reporting problems had significantly worse HAGOS (Hip and Groin Outcome Score) function than those without. The training implication is direct: hip and groin load monitoring should be continuous, not reactive. Pre- and post-practice adductor strength screening, the 5-second squeeze test, and HAGOS questionnaires at three points per season are the recommended clinical tools from this research.

A complementary cross-sectional study of professional female ice hockey players found that 62.3% experienced hip and groin problems affecting performance in the previous season, and players who had those problems demonstrated significantly impaired function on all HAGOS subscales at the start of the next season (Wörner, Thorborg & Eek 2020, International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy). This cross-season carryover effect is the mechanism through which chronic hip-groin underloading in youth players manifests as structural deficits in professional ones.

Butterfly Mechanics and FAI Risk

Motion capture research on ice hockey goaltenders confirms that during butterfly technique execution, goaltenders on average exceed their active internal rotation range of motion at the hip joint. Pad condition significantly affected butterfly width, and inter-individual variation in technique changed how much internal rotation each goaltender reached, but the mean behavior was to push past the active limit (Frayne et al. 2015, PMID 26122387). This chronic exposure to end-range hip internal rotation combined with impingement-provoking flexion-adduction positions creates the structural conditions for FAI development. The NSCA's clinical commentary explicitly notes that monitoring for progressive decreases in hip internal rotation in young goaltenders is a key injury-prevention action, and that maintaining adductor-to-abductor strength at or above 1:1.25 reduces groin injury risk (NSCA Coach, Vol. 9.4).

For Wave 6 cross-reference: the hip/groin injury burden in goaltenders connects directly to long-term structural hip outcomes including labral tears and early-onset osteoarthritis. Any goaltender already presenting with reduced internal rotation bilaterally, positive FADIR test, or groin pain during external rotation loading should be referred for diagnostic imaging before continuing at full butterfly load.

Knee Injury Epidemiology in NCAA Women's Ice Hockey

NCAA Injury Surveillance Program data from 2014–15 through 2018–19 shows that knee injuries accounted for 13.2% of all injuries in women's ice hockey — the second most common body region after head/face injuries — at an overall injury rate of 5.89 per 1000 athlete-exposures (Chandran, Nedimyer et al. 2021, Journal of Athletic Training). Women in ice hockey face knee injury risk patterns that parallel the broader literature on female team sport athletes, where hormonal and neuromuscular factors elevate ACL risk compared with male counterparts. The earlier NCAA study covering 2009–10 through 2014–15 in both men's and women's ice hockey found hip and groin injury rates of 0.78 per 1000 AEs for women, with 71.1% classified as non-time-loss injuries and strains being the most common diagnosis (76.3%) (Dalton, Zupon et al. 2016, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine). For goaltenders specifically, the non-time-loss pattern mirrors the overuse finding from the goaltender cohort study — many injuries continue to train through, creating cumulative loading that compounds over seasons.

Victevo 8-Core Data Anchor

The Victevo 8-Core Testing suite applies the hip adductor isometric strength test (standardized to 0° of hip flexion, bilateral, force plate normalized to body mass), CMJ via force plate, and the HAGOS sport subscale as the primary monitoring tools for women's goaltenders. The 8-Core Reactive Agility Test (RAT) is conducted on-ice to capture the butterfly push-and-recover speed that defines position performance. Hip IR range of motion is measured bilaterally at each off-season baseline and compared to the previous season's value — a decrease of 5° or more in either limb triggers load-reduction protocol and clinical referral. The 8-Core sport-skill composite for goaltenders uses save percentage as the primary field metric, benchmarked against current NCAA D1 and PWHL norms. See the 8-Core →

§5 — The Gap, Measured

A 15-year-old high school goaltender with a .890 team save percentage and a history of bilateral groin tightness has a measurable gap from the .930+ required to project toward a D1 roster. The Victevo Method makes that gap precise and actionable in six steps.

Measure. Establish a full 8-Core baseline at the start of the off-season: CMJ, 30-m sprint, force plate bilateral symmetry index, reactive agility (5-10-5 off-ice), isometric hip adductor and abductor strength at 0° and 25° hip abduction, VO2max via 3-km time trial or Yo-Yo test, HAGOS sport subscale score, and HRV resting baseline over 7 days. On-ice, record save percentage from game film split by shot zone.

Compare. Map each result to the three-tier table in §3. An average D1 goaltender at age 15–18 should be approaching CMJ of 40–42 cm, hip add:abd ratio at or above 1:1.0, and HAGOS sport subscale above 75/100. Save percentage benchmarks are age-adjusted: a .900 high school save percentage projects against D3 competition entry; .915+ projects toward D1 consideration.

Identify the Gap. In the example above, bilateral groin tightness and a HAGOS sport subscale below 70 signal the hip-groin deficit as the priority. The CMJ deficit reflects the cost of restricted hip function on power expression. The gap is not primarily technical — it is a hip mobility and adductor strength deficit that limits both injury resilience and butterfly mechanics simultaneously.

Build the Plan. In-season: 2×/wk Copenhagen plank series, isometric adductor holds, hip 90/90 stretching post-practice. Off-season: periodized adductor-loading block (RDL, single-leg deadlift, Copenhagen plank progressive overload), hip IR range of motion restoration via loaded and unloaded stretching, CMJ force plate training to convert the strength base to power.

Use Real Equipment and Testing. A force plate CMJ session identifies bilateral symmetry deficits that visual observation misses. Hip adductor isometric testing with a hand dynamometer or force plate at 0° and 25° of hip abduction maps the position-specific angle where injury risk is highest (Secomb et al. 2023). HRV tracking across a training week identifies recovery debt before the next game slot. These tools convert subjective coaching impressions into objective load-management decisions.

Re-Measure and Prove. Retest the full 8-Core at the pre-season baseline and again at mid-season. Track HAGOS scores biweekly during the competitive season. Compare save percentage quarterly against the opening-season benchmark. The goal is not to hit a single number — it is to demonstrate a measurable directional trend toward the tier benchmarks in §3 while keeping HAGOS sport subscale above 75 and hip IR ROM within 5° of the off-season baseline.

See the Victevo Method → | See the 8-Core →

Sources

Wörner T, Clarsen B, Thorborg K, Eek F. "Elite Ice Hockey Goalkeepers Have a High Prevalence of Hip and Groin Problems Associated With Decreased Sporting Function: A Single-Season Prospective Cohort Study." Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019;7(12). DOI: 10.1177/2325967119892586. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2325967119892586
Wörner T, Thorborg K, Eek F. "Hip and Groin Problems in the Previous Season Are Associated With Impaired Function in the Beginning of the New Season Among Professional Female Ice Hockey Players." International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. 2020;15(5):763–770. PMC: PMC7575147. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7575147/
Frayne RJ, Kelleher LK, Wegscheider PK, Dickey JP. "Development and Verification of a Protocol to Quantify Hip Joint Kinematics: An Evaluation of Ice Hockey Goaltender Pads on Hip Motion." Journal of Sports Sciences. 2015. PMID: 26122387. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26122387/
Dalton SL, Zupon AB, Gardner EC, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Kerr ZY. "The Epidemiology of Hip/Groin Injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Men's and Women's Ice Hockey: 2009–2010 Through 2014–2015 Academic Years." Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2016;4(3). DOI: 10.1177/2325967116632692. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2325967116632692
Chandran A, Nedimyer AK, Boltz AJ, Robison HJ, Collins CL, Morris SN. "Epidemiology of Injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Women's Ice Hockey: 2014–2015 Through 2018–2019." Journal of Athletic Training. 2021;56(7):695–703. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-546-20. https://nata.kglmeridian.com/view/journals/attr/56/7/article-p695.xml
Ransdell LB, Murray T. "A Physical Profile of Elite Female Ice Hockey Players from the USA." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011;25(9):2358–2363. PMID: 21804420. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21804420/
Lahti A, Grundberg A, Stenman E, Sundquist K. "Physical Characteristics of Swedish Female Professional Ice Hockey Players." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2024. PMC: PMC11841719. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11841719/
Jiménez-Casquet MJ, Conde-Pipo J, et al. "Cross-Sectional Study of the Anthropometric Profile and Nutrient Intake of Elite Female Ice Hockey Players." Nutrients. 2024;16(4):506. PMC: PMC10891979. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10891979/
Secomb JL, Kelly M, Dascombe BJ. "Hip Strength Profiling of Ice Hockey Athletes Across Various Joint-Specific Angles." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004420. https://journals.lww.com/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004420
Tétreault É, Fortin-Guichard D, Grondin S. "Contribution of Psychological Characteristics to Talent Identification in Ice-Hockey." International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17479541241304360. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17479541241304360
NSCA Coach Editorial Staff. "Ice Hockey — Special Considerations: The Goaltender." NSCA Coach. 2022;9(4):5. https://www.nsca.com/contentassets/e87a8be4b319453ab3576ba1c0d5fffd/nsca-coach-9.4.5-ice-hockey-special-considerations-the-goaltender.pdf
PWHL. "Campbell, Frankel and Schroeder Voted PWHL Goaltender of the Year Finalists." PWHL Official Site, May 21, 2024. https://www.thepwhl.com/en/news/2024/may/21/campbell-frankel-and-schroeder-voted-pwhl-goaltender-of-the-year-finalists
QuantHockey. "PWHL Goalie Stats 2024–2025." https://www.quanthockey.com/pwhl/en/seasons/pwhl-goalies-stats.html
NCAA.com. "NCAA College DI Women's Ice Hockey — Individual Statistics, Save Percentage." 2024–25 Season. https://www.ncaa.com/stats/icehockey-women/d1/current/individual/360
Wikipedia contributors. "2024–25 NCAA Division I Women's Ice Hockey Season." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024%E2%80%9325_NCAA_Division_I_women's_ice_hockey_season