Skip to main content
The Athlete Library· Women's Soccer · Defensive Midfielder

The Athlete · Women's Soccer · Defensive Midfielder

Victevo Media, LLC·18 min read·3,930 words·Benchmark: Victevo 8-Core Testing

The Athlete · Women's Soccer · Defensive Midfielder

§1 — The Athlete, Painted

Pia Lindqvist is the axis the team turns on. She touches the ball more than almost anyone on the pitch, sprints less than almost every outfield peer, and yet finishes each 90 minutes having covered as much ground as any player in the lineup. She is not the fastest player, not the most powerful, and not the highest leaper — but she sees the game earlier than anyone else, processes what she sees faster than the situation demands, and positions her body so that the next decision is already half-made before the ball arrives. That compound skill — spatial reading married to aerobic engine — is the defining trait of the women's soccer defensive midfielder. This article maps the physical archetype, the development ladder, the position-specific benchmarks, and the scientific evidence that should shape how any CDM at any level trains.

Physical Archetype

The women's soccer CDM sits in a distinct anthropometric window. Data drawn from multiple NCAA Division I and elite international cohorts show midfielders averaging 1.64–1.68 m in height and 58–65 kg in body mass — slightly lighter than central defenders and meaningfully leaner than goalkeepers, with body fat typically landing between 18–23% across competitive levels (Randell et al., 2021). Those numbers are not accidental. The CDM's mechanical job is to be evergreen — covering 10+ km across 90 minutes while absorbing repeated acceleration-deceleration cycles — so nature selects for a mid-range build that balances mass (needed for contact duels and ground dueling) against locomotor efficiency (needed to sustain work rate deep into the second half). Tall, heavy builds lose aerobic efficiency over high total distances; very light builds lose leverage in defensive transitions. The sweet spot is a compact, high-lean-mass frame capable of tolerating the broadest range of physical demands on the field.

Movement Archetype

At the FIFA Women's World Cup 2023, defensive and central midfielders accumulated the most total distance of any outfield position — approximately 15% more ground than centre-backs across a full match — with the minimum viable benchmark for a modern senior international midfielder established at roughly 8.7 km per game (FIFA Training Centre, 2024). The CDM specifically logs most of that distance at low-to-moderate intensities — jogging, low-intensity running, and positional shuffling — interspersed with high-demand bursts. Critically, 72–75% of a CDM's high-intensity running occurs out of possession, meaning her explosive output is primarily defensive in nature: closing pressing lanes, recovering shape, tracking runners in transition (Bradley, 2024). Sprint distances are the lowest of any outfield position in senior international play — roughly 39–163% less sprint volume than wide forwards — because tactical positioning replaces raw speed as the primary defensive tool. The CDM's movement signature is therefore characterized by high aerobic volume, moderate-intensity relentlessness, and short but frequent acceleration-deceleration events concentrated in defensive sequences.

A match yields approximately 25 pressing actions, 42 pass attempts, and 41 total off-ball offers per CDM at World Cup level — a workload structure unlike any other position on the field (Bradley, 2024). The locomotor and technical loads combine to create a player who is constantly in motion and constantly receiving information.

Mental Archetype

No position in field sports carries a higher cognitive tax per minute than the central midfielder. Research tracking visual exploratory behavior in elite women's central midfielders during the UEFA Women's European Championship 2022 recorded a mean scan frequency of 0.35 scans per second before ball receipt — a rate that directly predicted whether the subsequent action was successful (Feist et al., accepted, University of Essex repository). Scan frequency was a significant predictor of successful action type and of turning with the ball under pressure, with players who scanned more showing a greater likelihood of performing a turn or a forward pass rather than a backward ball or a dispossession.

Why is the CDM's cognitive load so extreme? A separate analysis across English Premier League match data confirmed that central midfielders show the highest mean scan frequency of any outfield position, significantly higher than forwards (Kruskal-Wallis H = 669.97, p < 0.001) (Jordet et al., 2020). The CDM serves as the transition pivot — connecting defensive and attacking phases simultaneously — which means working memory must hold the positions of pressing opponents, available passing outlets, the ball trajectory, and team defensive shape all at once, while updating that picture at roughly three passes per ten seconds. This is the cognitive architecture that Victevo labels "Game Sense": the capacity to read, update, and act on a continuous three-dimensional data stream in real time. It is trainable. It has measurable benchmarks. And it separates the good from the elite.


§2 — The 4 Pillars × 5 Segments × 4 Seasons Grid

Pillar 1: Strength & Power

SegmentOff-SeasonPre-SeasonIn-SeasonPost-Season
Youth (8–12)Bodyweight compound movements 2x/wk; skip, hop, jump progressions; no external loadIntro to med-ball throws; reactive jump games; ground-based balance workMaintain motor patterns 1x/wk; no heavy load; emphasis on recovery daysActive rest; unstructured play; fundamental movement screen
Middle School (13–14)Intro to resistance training 2x/wk; goblet squat, hip hinge, push-pull at RPE ≤ 7; CMJ baselineGeneral strength 2x/wk; add loaded hip thrust, split squat; CMJ check1–2 lifts/wk; maintenance load 60–70% 1RM; prioritize sleep and nutritionDeload; mobility maintenance; functional movement reassessment
High School (15–18)3x/wk; 70–80% 1RM; back squat, trap-bar deadlift, Romanian deadlift; CMJ monthly2–3x/wk; power emphasis (jump squat, broad jump, med-ball rotational throw); CMJ check every 3 wks1–2x/wk maintenance; strength standards reviewed at mid-season break; no maximal effort 48 h pre-match1x/wk general strength; corrective work for any in-season compensatory patterns found on force plate
College (D3–D1/NAIA/Club)3–4x/wk; progressive overload through 85% 1RM; force plate CMJ, isometric mid-thigh pull baseline3x/wk undulating periodization; power development block; weekly CMJ readiness monitoring1–2x/wk; load determined by GPS total distance that week; force plate RSI monitoring for fatigue detection2–3x/wk general strength; corrective emphasis; body composition recomposition window
Pro / Elite3–4x/wk; individualized to force plate asymmetry and HRV baselines; heavy lower emphasis; weekly CMJ normalization2–3x/wk; peak power emphasis; velocity-based training using 30–50% 1RM jumps; weekly load monitoring1x/wk in-season maintenance; GPS and HRV gate load decisions; micro-dosing plyometrics 48 h pre-match2–3x/wk; full debrief on force plate profiles from the season; targeted corrective block before next campaign

Pillar 2: Speed & Agility

SegmentOff-SeasonPre-SeasonIn-SeasonPost-Season
Youth (8–12)Tag games, reaction games, multidirectional movement in unstructured playFormal sprint ABCs 1x/wk; 10-yard reactive starts; no timing pressureMaintain via normal practice; teach deceleration mechanicsNo formal speed work; free active play
Middle School (13–14)Sprint mechanics 2x/wk; 10-m acceleration focus; ladder and cone patternsReactive agility progressions; short-area 1v1 defend/recover drillsWeekly acceleration drill; reaction to visual cue 1x/wk during warm-upRest; light footwork games
High School (15–18)2x/wk linear speed (10-, 20-, 30-m); change-of-direction drills (5-10-5 agility) timed; monthly benchmarkReactive agility with opponent cue; press-and-recover drills simulating CDM defensive transitionsWeekly speed sessions 1x; COD drills with ball; 20-m time tracked every 3 wksLight agility; no maximal sprint testing; reset sprint mechanics
College (D3–D1/NAIA/Club)2x/wk; 10-, 20-, 30-m timed; reactive agility (REACT light systems or partner-cued); GPS-measured peak sprint speed baseline3x/wk short acceleration volume; position-specific press-and-recover shuttle work; reactive agility test1x/wk; GPS max speed monitoring per session; peak speed target maintained within 5% of off-season maxAgility maintenance 1x/wk; reset sprint mechanics; reactive agility benchmark
Pro / Elite2x/wk; fly-10 and 30-m sprint baseline; reactive agility testing with optical sensors; GPS sprint speed profiling3x/wk; high-velocity sprinting ≥95% max speed built progressively; position-specific press-and-recover circuits1x/wk; GPS max speed gating; high-speed exposure maintained via training games when match frequency allowsDeload sprint work; technique refinement; formal reactive agility re-baseline

Pillar 3: Endurance & Conditioning

SegmentOff-SeasonPre-SeasonIn-SeasonPost-Season
Youth (8–12)Aerobic base through free play and sport sampling; no formal running programsIntro to intermittent running games; beep test familiarityMaintained through practice volume; no additional conditioning workActive recovery activities; swimming, cycling, hiking
Middle School (13–14)Aerobic base 2–3x/wk; steady-state runs 20–30 min at easy effort; Yo-Yo IRT Level 1 introIntermittent conditioning 2x/wk; small-sided games as conditioning vehicle; Yo-Yo IRT Level 1 baselinePractice provides conditioning stimulus; optional 10-min continuous run 1x/wk2x/wk easy aerobic activity; no structured interval work
High School (15–18)3x/wk; aerobic threshold runs 30–40 min; Yo-Yo IRT Level 1 benchmark established; target ≥ Level 133x/wk; intermittent conditioning 4:4 small-sided games; 120/60 interval runs; Yo-Yo IRT Level 1 re-testConditioning through training games; optional 1x/wk conditioning session; Yo-Yo IRT Level 1 mid-season check2x/wk; long slow aerobic run and one moderate interval session; no match-intensity conditioning
College (D3–D1/NAIA/Club)4x/wk; mix of aerobic threshold (zone 2) and high-intensity interval training; VO2max testing baseline; Yo-Yo IRT or 30-15 IFT test4x/wk; GPS-guided conditioning; simulated match bouts (2 × 45 min SSG series); HRV readiness check3 training sessions/wk; conditioning embedded in tactical work; GPS total distance target 65–75% of match load in training2x/wk; aerobic maintenance; VO2max re-test at season end to quantify detraining
Pro / Elite4–5x/wk; periodized aerobic block; VO2max target ≥ 50 mL/kg/min; GPS and HRV monitor; Yo-Yo IRT Level 2 baseline5x/wk; progressive match-load ramp; GPS total distance build from 60% to 90% of target match load over 4 wksConditioning through match + training; GPS daily load monitored; HRV morning check gates intensity; ≥72 h between heavy conditioning and matchActive recovery immediately post-match (low-intensity cycling, pool session); full neuromuscular recovery target 72 h per current science

Pillar 4: Skill & Sport-IQ

SegmentOff-SeasonPre-SeasonIn-SeasonPost-Season
Youth (8–12)1v1 receiving and passing in small spaces; rondos; no positional specializationPosition introduction; simple 4v4 games; scanning habit introduction (look before you receive)Fun-first positional games; coach cues on head movement before receivingUnstructured ball play; no formal training
Middle School (13–14)Receiving under pressure 2x/wk; scanning habit drilled in rondo; intro to defensive shapePositional SSGs; CDM-specific defensive shadow drills; short-passing combination under time pressureTactical work in practice; post-game film review of own scanning decisions 1x/wkBall mastery individual work; review of scanning video
High School (15–18)3x/wk; receiving facing pressure in tight spaces; press-resistance patterns; scanning frequency drilled by coach cuePositional scripted plays; defensive block shape; transition press-and-recover patterns; first-touch orientation drillsWeekly positional review; coach feedback on press triggers and cover shadow positioning; scanning frequency tracked if technology availableRevisit fundamental receiving patterns; watch professional CDM match footage 1x/wk for tactical learning
College (D3–D1/NAIA/Club)3–4x/wk; advanced CDM-specific skills: turn under pressure, switching the field, positional press coordination; video analysisFull tactical system integration; defensive press triggers; positional scripting in 11v11; scanning cued in training games1–2x/wk position-specific tactical sessions; GPS + video combined review; Game Sense score tracked if Victevo testing availableFilm review of full season; identify tactical gaps in press-read and transition; set off-season development priorities
Pro / EliteIndividualized skill refinement; advanced cognitive training (video-occlusion scenarios, 360-degree spatial tasks); Game Sense profilingFull tactical integration; system-specific CDM scripting; scanning frequency benchmarked and compared to WWC dataMatch tape review of every game; cognitive load tracked via Game Sense assessment; in-season scanning habit maintained via short pre-match visual prep routinesFull season debrief; cognitive profiling; Game Sense score compared year-over-year

§3 — Position-Specific Numbers (3 Tiers)

The table below uses Victevo 8-Core Testing as the canonical benchmark column. Comparison figures are drawn from published FIFA, NCAA, and peer-reviewed GPS data. Where exact CDM-specific values are not published at a given tier, cells are labeled accordingly.

MetricAverage D1Top 10% D1Pro / Elite BaselineSource
Sprint (30 m)4.6–4.9 s≤ 4.3 s≤ 4.2 sSausaman et al. 2019; Randell et al. 2021
CMJ Height30–34 cm≥ 37 cm≥ 38 cm(Victevo editorial target — derived from NCAA Division I women's soccer cohort data, Randell et al. 2021)
Force Plate RSI1.2–1.5≥ 1.7≥ 1.8(Victevo editorial target — derived from CMJ and sprint benchmarks across published women's soccer cohorts)
Reactive Agility (5-10-5)≤ 5.0 s≤ 4.7 s≤ 4.6 sSausaman et al. 2019; NCSA recruiting benchmarks
Aerobic Capacity (Yo-Yo IRT Level 1)Level 13–14 (~1,000–1,200 m)Level 15+ (~1,400+ m)Level 16+ (~1,600+ m)Randell et al. 2021; Sausaman et al. 2019
Match Total Distance9,000–9,600 m9,600–10,200 m10,200–11,000 mSausaman et al. 2019; FIFA Training Centre, 2024
Match High-Speed Running (>15 km/h)840–1,050 m1,050–1,400 m1,500–2,000 mSausaman et al. 2019; Datson et al. 2017
Match Sprint Distance (>19 km/h)267–350 m350–500 m400–600 mSausaman et al. 2019; FIFA WWC 2023 data, Bradley 2024
Sport-Skill Composite: Scan Frequency0.20–0.28 scans/s0.30–0.35 scans/s≥ 0.35 scans/sFeist et al. 2024; Jordet et al. 2020
Recovery / HRVFull neuromuscular recovery at 72 h post-matchHRV within 5% of baseline by 48 hHRV restored ≤ 48 h; CMJ normalized by 72 hAndersson et al. 2008; pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9372388/

§4 — Medical & Scientific Anchors

Anchor 1: Running Profile and Positional Demands (PubMed)

Datson et al. (2017) analyzed 148 individual match observations from 107 outfield players across 2011–2013 elite international women's competition using the Prozone computerized tracking system. Central midfielders completed the highest total distance (10,985 ± 706 m) and high-speed running distance (2,882 ± 500 m) of any outfield position, with central defenders recording the lowest values. Between-half reductions in physical performance were present for all positions and all variables, indicating a meaningful fatigue gradient that CDMs must train to resist. The training implication is direct: CDMs must develop a specific aerobic base capable of sustaining high-volume, moderate-intensity locomotion across 90 minutes, and conditioning work must replicate the second-half fatigue environment rather than only the first-half demand.

Anchor 2: Neuromuscular Recovery Timeline After Female Soccer Match (PubMed)

Andersson et al. (2008) tracked 17 elite female soccer players across two matches separated by 72 hours, measuring sprint performance, countermovement jump, isokinetic knee strength, creatine kinase, and muscle soreness at seven time points. Sprint ability recovered by 5 hours post-match; isokinetic knee extension recovered by 27 hours; isokinetic knee flexion and CMJ were still suppressed at 69 hours post-match. Creatine kinase and muscle soreness had not fully resolved when the second match began. Active recovery (submaximal cycling plus low-intensity resistance training) showed no advantage over passive recovery in the timeline. For CDMs — who accumulate the highest sustained movement loads per match — this 72-hour recovery arc sets the minimum viable scheduling standard. Congested fixture periods (fewer than 72 hours between matches) require load management during training on the day before the second match and are associated with reduced physical output on match day, as confirmed by subsequent NCAA Division I monitoring data.

Anchor 3: Visual Exploratory Activity and Game Sense in Elite Women's CDMs (Peer-Reviewed)

Published research examining elite female central midfielders from the knockout stages of UEFA Women's EURO 2022 found that scan frequency before ball receipt averaged 0.35 scans per second, with pitch location as the primary predictor of scan rate (Feist et al., University of Essex repository). Higher scan frequencies predicted a greater likelihood of successful actions and ball turns under pressure (p = 0.003). Critically, the elite women's scan rates were lower than those published for men's elite and academy players, identifying a trainable gap in the women's game. Scanning behavior is a learnable habit — not a fixed trait — and can be improved through targeted interventions including rondo constraints with coach cues, pre-receive head-movement prompts, and video-based occlusion training. A five-week focused intervention has been shown to increase scanning counts significantly in youth female players (Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2025). Victevo treats Game Sense — the integrated capacity for real-time field reading — as a measurable, trainable physical attribute tracked in the 8-Core.

Anchor 4: FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 Positional Benchmarks (Governing Body)

FIFA's official post-tournament analysis of the 2023 Women's World Cup — covering all 64 games with an optical tracking system under FIFA's formal approval — established that defensive and central midfielders covered 5–15% more total distance than centre-backs, wide defenders, and centre-forwards (p < 0.01; ES: 0.6–1.8) (FIFA Training Centre / Bradley, 2024). The minimum benchmark for a modern international female midfielder was set at 8.7 km per game. CDMs performed 72–75% of their high-intensity running out of possession — compared with 40–48% for wide midfielders and forwards — confirming that the CDM's explosive output is defensive rather than attacking. Top speeds for DMs ranged 28.0–28.1 km/h, the lowest of any outfield position. This data set is the single most authoritative reference for CDM load benchmarking at the global senior level and informs the Pro/Elite tier values in §3.

Anchor 5: Victevo 8-Core Testing Integration

The Victevo 8-Core anchors all performance tracking to validated field and lab instruments: 30-m sprint (blocks or rolling), countermovement jump (force plate), reactive agility (REACT system or equivalent optical sensor), aerobic capacity (Yo-Yo IRT Level 1 or 2), grip/iso strength (isometric mid-thigh pull), recovery/HRV (morning HRV via validated wrist or chest strap), and Sport-Skill Composite incorporating a standardized Game Sense evaluation protocol. For the women's CDM, the Sport-Skill Composite is the highest-weighting component because Game Sense — as documented by the FIFA and UEFA data above — is both the primary performance discriminator and the most undertested attribute in standard athletic assessments. Standard soccer recruiting profiles focus on sprint times and aerobic tests; the Victevo 8-Core adds the cognitive layer that research confirms separates average from elite CDMs.


§5 — The Gap, Measured

Most female CDMs arrive at their first high-level program having been evaluated on the same metrics as every other outfield player: 40-yard dash, Yo-Yo test, vertical jump. Those numbers matter. But they do not measure what makes a CDM a CDM. The largest performance gap for athletes at this position — across every tier from high school to professional — is not speed or power. It is Game Sense: the measurable scan rate, pattern recognition speed, and positional decision quality that the science directly links to successful CDM play.

Measure. Test a CDM using the full Victevo 8-Core battery: 30-m sprint, CMJ on a force plate, reactive agility, Yo-Yo IRT Level 1, isometric mid-thigh pull, morning HRV protocol, and the Sport-Skill Composite Game Sense evaluation. The Game Sense score generates a scan-frequency baseline, a decision-speed number, and a positional-awareness rating.

Compare. Stack those results against the tier-appropriate benchmarks in §3. A D1 average CDM scans at 0.20–0.28 times per second; the top 10% reach 0.30–0.35; elite internationals average 0.35. A D1 midfielder running 267–350 m of sprint distance per match sits at the average; the pro baseline begins above 400 m. Every gap is named and measurable.

Identify the gap. For most CDMs, the delta lives in one of three places: aerobic capacity below the Yo-Yo Level 13 threshold; reactive agility above 5.0 seconds on the 5-10-5; or scan frequency below 0.25. Each gap maps to a specific pillar prescription.

Build the plan. Aerobic capacity gaps are addressed in Pillar 3 via Yo-Yo-targeted interval blocks and GPS-monitored conditioning. Reactive agility gaps are addressed in Pillar 2 via position-specific press-and-recover drills. Game Sense gaps are addressed in Pillar 4 via rondo scanning constraints and video-occlusion training.

Use real equipment and testing. Force plates, GPS units, and validated HRV monitors are not optional at the college and professional level — they are the instruments that convert training intuition into auditable data. The Victevo 8-Core is built around equipment that is accessible at every level from high school programs to national training centers.

Re-measure and prove. Re-test the full 8-Core at the end of each training block — minimum quarterly. Scan frequency, sprint time, Yo-Yo level, and recovery HRV should each move in measurable increments. If they do not, the training prescription changes.

The CDM position rewards athletes who train it specifically. The science exists. The benchmarks exist. The gap between where a player is and where she needs to be is now a number.

See the Victevo Method → | See the 8-Core →


Sources

  1. Datson N, Drust B, Weston M, Jarman IH, Lisboa PJ, Gregson W. Match Physical Performance of Elite Female Soccer Players During International Competition. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(9):2379–2387. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001575. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27467514/

  2. Andersson H, Raastad T, Nilsson J, Paulsen G, Garthe I, Kadi F. Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in elite female soccer: effects of active recovery. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(2):372–380. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815b8497. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18202563/

  3. Jordet G, Aksum KM, Pedersen DN, Walvekar A, Trivedi A, McCall A, Ivarsson A, Priestley D. Scanning, Contextual Factors, and Association With Performance in English Premier League Footballers: An Investigation Across a Season. Front Psychol. 2020;11:553813. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.553813. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7573254/

  4. Feist T, et al. Visual exploratory activity in elite women's soccer: an analysis of central midfield players at UEFA Women's European Championship 2022. Accepted manuscript, University of Essex repository, 2024. URL: https://repository.essex.ac.uk/37506/1/VEA%20Women%27s%20Soccer%20Manuscript%20-%20ACCEPTED%20VERSION.pdf

  5. Bradley PS. 'Setting the Benchmark' Part 3: Benchmarking Match Demands of Specialised Positions at the FIFA Women's World Cup Australia and New Zealand 2023. Biol Sport. 2024. DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2024.139852. PMC: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11694207/ | FIFA Training Centre: https://www.fifatrainingcentre.com/en/game/tournaments/fifa-womens-world-cup/2023/post-tournament-analysis/physical-analysis/part-3-setting-physical-benchmarks-across-positions.php

  6. Sausaman RW, Sams ML, Mizuguchi S, DeWeese BH, Stone MH. The Physical Demands of NCAA Division I Women's College Soccer. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2019;4(4):73. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk4040073. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7739409/

  7. Randell RK, Clifford T, Drust B, Moss SL, Unnithan VB, De Ste Croix MBA, Datson N, Martin D, Mayho H, Carter JM, Rollo I. Physiological Characteristics of Female Soccer Players and Health and Performance Considerations. Sports Med. 2021;51(6):1377–1399. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01458-1. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8222040/

  8. González-García J, Giráldez-Costas V, Ramirez-Campillo R, Drust B, Romero-Moraleda B. Assessment of Peak Physical Demands in Elite Women Soccer Players: Can Contextual Variables Play a Role? Res Q Exerc Sport. 2023;94(2):517–527. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2021.2004297. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35025719/

  9. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. "Heads Up Girls" — A training intervention to improve scanning behavior in young female football players. Front Sports Act Living. 2025. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sports-and-active-living/articles/10.3389/fspor.2025.1602099/full

  10. Pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Training in women soccer players: A systematic review on training load. Front Psychol. 2022. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9372388/


© 2026 Victevo Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Built on the Victevo Method.™

Keep reading

Every position. Every sport. Measured.

The VICTEVO Library covers every position in every sport on the platform — the archetype, the training prescription, the benchmark numbers, and the gap-closing plan.

Browse the Library
© 2026 Victevo Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Built on the Victevo Method.™
The Athlete · Women's Soccer · Defensive Midfielder | VICTEVO Sports